Thanks you guys for the sharing. Really learn a lot. Cheers to all
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SGDRIFters Drift Into Quad
Collapse
X
-
X-MEN Reunited Last Night!!!!!
Old Friends reunited...new Friendship Forged.
Many thanks for all who turn up (About 30+ participants) and for those who didn't manage to swing by, see you in the next meet.
Almost carpark full...so some folks resort to parking on the spiral no-park zone
It was a fantastic multi-rotor friendly exchange and discussion.
Here're the pix from last nite session....I look forward to organizing more x-men meet up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nightmare8118 View PostThanks you guys for the sharing. Really learn a lot. Cheers to all
Comment
-
Originally posted by tom99sg View PostWondering when u all will be meeting up? Looking forward to join u guys..
However, Speeder (Zhirong) is always there to tackle any queries you have though.
Comment
-
Hi Folks
There's quite a fair bit of people who pm and text me regarding which flight controller to choose for their quad.
Well, here's my opinion
1) First up, I'm one who prefer more flight time over tweak time, you wont go wrong with the DJI or ZeroUAV solutions.
2) My preference slants toward the DJI solutions - naza m for a simple 4 rotors and the wkm for the hexacopter and beyond. Very easy to setup and tweak and you get to fly it in no time. I setup my dji450 using Futaba's s-bus system to void connecting a bunch of wires (A, E, T, R, U, X1. Some will say s-bus not proven...but it worked well for me.
3) The zerouavs YS-X4 and X6 are also my flight controller of choice but these are reserved for bigger quads and motor rotors (eg DJI F-550 or Xaircraft) - the flight controller module + power management module / cables + wifi/bt uplink module are fairly chunky. One great advantage of these controllers amongst all the other frills (e.g. smart takeoff and hover, encircle mode, follow me mode) is that it allows me to easily set and tweak my quad on the fly via an Android or Ipad smart devices without lugging along my notebook to the field.
On the downside...instructions for the zerouavs isnt as clear as the DJI - due the the direct Chinese to English translation...took me a while to familiarize with their lingo.
4) Next comes the apm2.5 which I purchased recently along with the Ublox GPS...quite a different animal compared to the off-the-shelves solutions (like the zeros and dii). Dont expect it to just solder, connect and fly....you can't. I have scouted arducopter forum for the best PID setting, tried many different PIDs setting, expecting it to perform like the naza m...well it cant (at least for me).
apm uses a bunch of terms in which you need get yourself familiarize with.
a) Loiter Mode (aka GPS att mode)
Well for me, as the name implies....it literally loiter around and quite hard to hold on to a fix position even if it has all the sats acquisition.
b) Stabilize mode (aka Not-So Stabilize Mode)
All round best mode to fly....however mine cant really take the wind unlike the other off-the shelves.
c) Att Hold
Never quite hold for me, even after countless craft calibration, TX auto calibration....
I'll probably need to spent more time tinkering with the apm.
All-in all I'm happy with the current off-the-shelves implementation./
Pls note that the above is purely my personal views on what's out there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bozora View PostHi Folks
There's quite a fair bit of people who pm and text me regarding which flight controller to choose for their quad.
Well, here's my opinion
1) First up, I'm one who prefer more flight time over tweak time, you wont go wrong with the DJI or ZeroUAV solutions.
2) My preference slants toward the DJI solutions - naza m for a simple 4 rotors and the wkm for the hexacopter and beyond. Very easy to setup and tweak and you get to fly it in no time. I setup my dji450 using Futaba's s-bus system to void connecting a bunch of wires (A, E, T, R, U, X1. Some will say s-bus not proven...but it worked well for me.
3) The zerouavs YS-X4 and X6 are also my flight controller of choice but these are reserved for bigger quads and motor rotors (eg DJI F-550 or Xaircraft) - the flight controller module + power management module / cables + wifi/bt uplink module are fairly chunky. One great advantage of these controllers amongst all the other frills (e.g. smart takeoff and hover, encircle mode, follow me mode) is that it allows me to easily set and tweak my quad on the fly via an Android or Ipad smart devices without lugging along my notebook to the field.
On the downside...instructions for the zerouavs isnt as clear as the DJI - due the the direct Chinese to English translation...took me a while to familiarize with their lingo.
4) Next comes the apm2.5 which I purchased recently along with the Ublox GPS...quite a different animal compared to the off-the-shelves solutions (like the zeros and dii). Dont expect it to just solder, connect and fly....you can't. I have scouted arducopter forum for the best PID setting, tried many different PIDs setting, expecting it to perform like the naza m...well it cant (at least for me).
apm uses a bunch of terms in which you need get yourself familiarize with.
a) Loiter Mode (aka GPS att mode)
Well for me, as the name implies....it literally loiter around and quite hard to hold on to a fix position even if it has all the sats acquisition.
b) Stabilize mode (aka Not-So Stabilize Mode)
All round best mode to fly....however mine cant really take the wind unlike the other off-the shelves.
c) Att Hold
Never quite hold for me, even after countless craft calibration, TX auto calibration....
I'll probably need to spent more time tinkering with the apm.
All-in all I'm happy with the current off-the-shelves implementation./
Pls note that the above is purely my personal views on what's out there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wengwah View Post
Till it get stabilise I prolly use the ArduRover profile in my truck
Comment
-
FYI, this Arduino board is very versatile. You can use it on Fixed Wing, Rover and even building robot. I beg that there is no way that Naza can beat the opensource community.
Btw, have you tried the AndroPilot on Android Tablet? You should try that out.
Originally posted by bozora View PostThanks Weng Wah for posting...and yes I got it stabilize as in the video on my apm2.5 ...indoor. However I realize that it doesnt quite hold altitude. I need constant adjustments. The internal baro doesn't quite worked well for me. Outdoor is stable under moderate wind...but again altitude doesnt quite hold. Can you or the folks out there share your PID in loiter, stabilize and att hold for your dji450. I could be having a wrong pid setting. My kaki went up to meet with Janni in Thailand who sells the arduino....he flies it slightly better. but again the att hold and landing is fairly jittery.
Till it get stabilise I prolly use the ArduRover profile in my truck
Comment
-
Originally posted by wengwah View PostFYI, this Arduino board is very versatile. You can use it on Fixed Wing, Rover and even building robot. I beg that there is no way that Naza can beat the opensource community.
Btw, have you tried the AndroPilot on Android Tablet? You should try that out.
Comment
Comment