any tips?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
how to increase piro rate on gy240??
Collapse
X
-
change gyro?
But rookie as I am, why should the gyro affect piro rate? I thought the pitch of the tail blade should affect piro rate in total?JR PCM 9XII
35.150
BEAM E4
HS65 Cyclic
Futaba S3154 Tail
Scorpion 2221-8
JETI Spin 44A
JR RS 77
Logictech 2100 TL Gyro
Thunder Power TP2070-3SX
A Bottle Of Guts, Neat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Heli_fanaticmy tail pitch slider is all the way to the end already without binding
Hope that helps.-Feda Dragonfly
-Hornet 2
-Pilot OK Turmeric
-Zoom Zoom 4D
-Sceadu EVO 50: OS50, Hatori521, Revmax,
-Hornet X3D
-Hornet X3D (yet to setup!)
-Formosa 1
-World Models Spot On 50
-HB King 2
-World Models Groovy 50 F3A
-RICCS F18 EDF
Controlled by 9CHP
(Temasek Poly AMIG)
Comment
-
Originally posted by glenn cainchange gyro?
But rookie as I am, why should the gyro affect piro rate? I thought the pitch of the tail blade should affect piro rate in total?
think logically... if you sent a rudder signal and a wind came along, the gyro will have to act up to hold the tail during the turn, right? if it gave the heli an uncontrolled full rudder servo throw, then your tail won't hold in a turn when there's a wind... this is exactly it if you turn off HH.. or for gyros like PG-03.
the pitch slider will affect piro rate only in GY401 where you can set limit. for GY240, like Fit said, won't bind in flight that's because the gyro controls the piro rate and it's piro rate is rather slow, thus requiring only very minimal servo movement.
only way to get higher piro rate is to increase rudder dualrate and EPA/ATV.. whatever your TX calls it.
pls correct me if i'm wrong
Comment
-
Here is what I previously did comparison with GY240, GY401 and PG-03 during comparison of which gyro is suitable for cyclic stability:
The response speed of GY240 is slower than GY401 and PG-03. With that, when u send signal move the tail (or change tail blade pitch), the response is slower and thus the piro speed is slower.
Then for GY240 and PG-03, it has a situation whereby when it start to piro, the gyro actually sense the movement and offset some value back instead. That is why alot of people said that for GY240, it will not get binding when in flight as compare to stationary. For GY401, when u send signal to tail servo to move, it will move the tail and ignoring the gyro sensing (in other word, it does not offset or compensate back...like GY240/PG-03)
All that above will make the piro for GY401 to be faster than GY240.
SH
Comment
-
Originally posted by Super-HornetHere is what I previously did comparison with GY240, GY401 and PG-03 during comparison of which gyro is suitable for cyclic stability:
The response speed of GY240 is slower than GY401 and PG-03. With that, when u send signal move the tail (or change tail blade pitch), the response is slower and thus the piro speed is slower.
Then for GY240 and PG-03, it has a situation whereby when it start to piro, the gyro actually sense the movement and offset some value back instead. That is why alot of people said that for GY240, it will not get binding when in flight as compare to stationary. For GY401, when u send signal to tail servo to move, it will move the tail and ignoring the gyro sensing (in other word, it does not offset or compensate back...like GY240/PG-03)
All that above will make the piro for GY401 to be faster than GY240.
SH
so can i say that it is something like... the delay settings on the GY401 is to tell the gyro how fast (resolution) it should detect the piro and issue the next servo command (whether to speed up the piro or not... ), so if the delay is high, the detection rate is slower (to compensate for slow servo movement) and thus slow down the piro rate?
Comment
Comment