Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

72mhz formulae

Collapse

Zenm Tech Pte Ltd

Collapse

Visit Zenmtech at rc.zenmtech.com

X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    72mhz formulae

    Just need to confirm with those who know, the calculations for 72mhz frequency/channel number is xx x2 minus 21 right???

    Eg.... Freq flag is 20...so 20x2 = 40 minus 21 is 19.

    Thus for a Freq flag of ch20, actual frequency is 72.190mhz right???

    Read that somewhere, but just can't find the source again...so need to confirm.
    [SIZE="1"]
    [url]www.dxnmedia.net[/url]
    Video Post Production | HD Acquisition | Media Consultant

    [/SIZE]

    #2
    72Mhz Band

    Ch Mhz
    15 72.090
    16 72.110
    17 72.130
    18 72.150
    19 72.170
    20 72.190
    21 72.210
    22 72.230
    23 72.250
    24 72.270
    25 72.290
    26 72.310
    27 72.330
    28 72.350
    29 72.370
    30 72.390
    31 72.410
    32 72.430
    33 72.450
    34 72.470
    35 72.490
    36 72.510
    37 72.530
    38 72.550
    39 72.570
    40 72.590
    41 72.610
    42 72.630
    43 72.650
    44 72.670
    45 72.690
    46 72.710
    47 72.730
    48 72.750
    49 72.770
    50 72.790
    51 72.810
    52 72.830
    53 72.850
    54 72.870
    55 72,890
    56 72.910
    57 72.930
    58 72.950
    59 72.970
    60 72.990


    Thanks
    2.4G

    Comment


      #3
      yes...the formular is correct... thanks!
      [SIZE="1"]
      [url]www.dxnmedia.net[/url]
      Video Post Production | HD Acquisition | Media Consultant

      [/SIZE]

      Comment


        #4
        Hi got something to enquire... Seems like there are lots of 72mhz flyers in this forum but i read it from somewhere that higher frequency has less propagation power. So why do we still use 72 mhz instead of 29mhz??? Pls enlight me...

        Comment


          #5
          Propagation power is relative to transmission power.
          Technically it is not important to be bothered about this issue because the transmission range at 350~500mW output (for most cases of tx specs) is probably further what your eyes can see at either frequency.

          Lower frequency would also mean that your transmission can be more easily be affected by RF noise...pros & cons.
          [SIZE="1"]
          [url]www.dxnmedia.net[/url]
          Video Post Production | HD Acquisition | Media Consultant

          [/SIZE]

          Comment


            #6
            also, lower frequency would mean that the signal have lesser bandwidth, thus cannot carry more stable 'info'.

            Although it's not technically proven, I think that is why PCM was originally developed & meant for 72mhz operation. Can't remember where I came across this info, coz i got no proof to back up this claim.
            [SIZE="1"]
            [url]www.dxnmedia.net[/url]
            Video Post Production | HD Acquisition | Media Consultant

            [/SIZE]

            Comment


              #7
              hey thanks for the info!!! Very informative!!! Hey how come u know so much ah??? can give me some tips....

              Comment


                #8
                Read a lot..

                I'm not formally electronics engineering trained, but playing with audio waveforms & RF for Radio/TV/satellite transmission is kinda related to my work...so i gotta know a few tricks or two.

                Moreover, one of my interests/hobbies was Amateur Radio as well, so all the more i am interested in this field. If u look carefully, it's all back to basic physics which you've learnt in Secondary school....just gotta know how to apply them to certain things in real life.

                [SIZE="1"]
                [url]www.dxnmedia.net[/url]
                Video Post Production | HD Acquisition | Media Consultant

                [/SIZE]

                Comment


                  #9
                  Oh ok!!! no wonder you are speaking like a pro like tat

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X